Up to 1 year for each magazine. That is up to 20 years for the magazines that make up this picture. Does that sound right to anyone? If they are loaded with more than 7 rounds, that will cost another $4,000 if it is the first offense and I am in my home. That is for the mags only, not counting the years that I would get for not registering the Mak90 or SKS. (I have no idea if these are all of the illegal mags that I own.)
MAK 90 S&W 41 SKS GLOCK 17 MAK 90
* § 265.36 Unlawful possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding
device.
It shall be unlawful for a person to knowingly possess a large
capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured before September
thirteenth, nineteen hundred ninety-four, and if such person lawfully
possessed such large capacity feeding device before the effective date
of the chapter of the laws of two thousand thirteen which added this
section, that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or
converted to accept, more than ten rounds of ammunition.
An individual who has a reasonable belief that such device is of such
a character that it may lawfully be possessed and who surrenders or
lawfully disposes of such device within thirty days of being notified by
law enforcement or county licensing officials that such possession is
unlawful shall not be guilty of this offense. It shall be a rebuttable
presumption that such person knows that such large capacity ammunition
feeding device may not be lawfully possessed if he or she has been
contacted by law enforcement or county licensing officials and informed
that such device may not be lawfully possessed.
Unlawful possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device is a
class A misdemeanor.
* NB Effective March 16, 2013
* § 265.37 Unlawful possession of certain ammunition feeding devices.
It shall be unlawful for a person to knowingly possess an ammunition
feeding device that such person lawfully possessed before the effective
date of the chapter of the laws of two thousand thirteen which added
this section, that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or
converted to accept more than seven but less than ten rounds of
ammunition, where such device contains more than seven rounds of
ammunition.
If such device containing more than seven rounds of ammunition is
possessed within the home of the possessor, the person so possessing the
device shall, for a first offense, be guilty of a violation and subject
to a fine of two hundred dollars, and for a second offense, be guilty of
a class B misdemeanor and subject to a fine of two hundred dollars and a
term of up to three months imprisonment.
If such device containing more than seven rounds of ammunition is
possessed in any location other than the home of the possessor, the
person so possessing the device shall, for a first offense, be guilty of
a class B misdemeanor and subject to a fine of two hundred dollars and a
term of up to six months imprisonment, and for a second offense, be
guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
* NB Effective March 16, 2013
70.15 Sentences of imprisonment for misdemeanors and violation.
1. Class A misdemeanor. A sentence of imprisonment for a class A
misdemeanor shall be a definite sentence. When such a sentence is
imposed the term shall be fixed by the court, and shall not exceed one
year; provided, however, that a sentence of imprisonment imposed upon a
conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree as
defined in subdivision one of section 265.01 must be for a period of no
less than one year when the conviction was the result of a plea of
guilty entered in satisfaction of an indictment or any count thereof
charging the defendant with the class D violent felony offense of
criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree as defined in
subdivision four of section 265.02, except that the court may impose any
other sentence authorized by law upon a person who has not been
previously convicted in the five years immediately preceding the
commission of the offense for a felony or a class A misdemeanor defined
in this chapter, if the court having regard to the nature and
circumstances of the crime and to the history and character of the
defendant, finds on the record that such sentence would be unduly harsh
and that the alternative sentence would be consistent with public safety
and does not deprecate the seriousness of the crime.
